Cases 131 - 140 of 271
ROSE v. THE MORNING CALL NEWSPAPER et al
as 5:2015cv02002
Plaintiff:
JIMI ROSE
Defendant:
THE MORNING CALL NEWSPAPER, MARANATHA BROADCASTING COMPANY, INC., BASILIO A. BONILLA, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WALLACE v. UNKNOWN OFFICERS et al
as 2:2015cv01857
Plaintiff:
MAURICE WALLACE
Defendant:
WHITE, UNKNOWN OFFICERS and THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FINNERMAN v. SEPTA et al
as 2:2015cv01654
Plaintiff:
NASIR FINNERMAN
Defendant:
SEPTA, MELODY CAMPBELL, CABAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00435
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
FLOYD v. FIVE UNKNOWN, UNITED STATES MARSHALS
as 2:2015cv00345
Plaintiff:
DARRELL FLOYD
Defendant:
FIVE UNKNOWN, UNITED STATES MARSHALS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2679
LAWRENCE et al v. TYCOON INVESTMENT INC. et al
as 2:2014cv07156
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL A. LAWRENCE and MARLENE JOHNSON
Defendant:
TYCOON INVESTMENT INC., Y.N.L.M.E., INC., COBY KRISPIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROLLINS v. LICIARDELLO et al
as 2:2014cv06836
Plaintiff:
KEITH ROLLINS
Defendant:
THOMAS LICIARDELLO, JEFFREY WALKER, BRIAN REYNOLDS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
YORI v. ERIE COMMON PLEAS COURTHOUSE et al
as 1:2014cv00296
Plaintiff:
TAMMY YORI
Defendant:
ERIE COMMON PLEAS COURTHOUSE, WESTERN DISTRICT BANKRUPTCY COURT OF ERIE, PA, MICHAEL ANDREW RUIZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
JACOBS et al v. PALMER et al
as 2:2014cv05797
Plaintiff:
KEN JACOBS and TIMOTHY WILLIAMS
Defendant:
M. PALMER , WORRILOW , UNKNOWN DELAWARE COUNTY POLICE OFFICERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv04881
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
