Cases 131 - 140 of 12,076
Estopare v. City of St. Louis
as 4:2024cv00428
Plaintiff:
steven J estopare and Steven J. Estopare
Defendant:
CITY OF ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI and City of St. Louis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00197
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 794 Rehabilitation Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00429
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00199
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Johnson-Byrd et al v. PennyMac Loan Services, LLC
as 4:2024cv00200
Plaintiff:
Arlene Johnson-Byrd and Louis Byrd
Defendant:
PennyMac Loan Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Garrett et al v. Garland et al
as 6:2024cv03076
Plaintiff:
Dwayne M Garrett and Paul Leroy Wickham
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, Mike Johnson, Eastern District of Oklahoma and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00193
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Keys v. Extended Stay America Corporation
as 4:2024cv00418
Plaintiff:
Sidney Keys, Sr.
Defendant:
Extended Stay America Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Keys v. QuikTrip Corporation
as 4:2024cv00419
Plaintiff:
Sidney Keys, Sr.
Defendant:
QuikTrip Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00424
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
