Cases 131 - 140 of 38,929
Maxwell v. Dallas Independent School District
as 3:2024cv02204
Defendant:
Dallas Independent School District
Plaintiff:
Chasity Maxwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
United Sovereign Americans et al v Nelson et al
as 2:2024cv00184
Petitioner:
United Sovereign Americans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02207
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Gonzalez et al v. City of Mission
as 7:2024cv00359
Defendant:
City of Mission
Plaintiff:
Rogelio Gonzalez and Aida Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Gaytan v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services
as 1:2024cv00128
Defendant:
Texas Department of Family and Protective Services
Plaintiff:
Maribel Gaytan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Peterson v. Murphree et al
as 4:2024cv00781
Defendant:
Denton County, Texas and Sheriff Tracy Murphree
Plaintiff:
Ryan Peterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00775
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Rogers v. City of Kirby et al
as 5:2024cv00964
Plaintiff:
Romen Rogers
Defendant:
City of Kirby, Sylvia Apodaca, Jason Rendon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Qaddumi v. University of Texas At Austin et al
as 1:2024cv01002
Defendant:
Jay Hartzell, Sharon Wood and University of Texas At Austin
Plaintiff:
Ammer Qaddumi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sims v. Texas General Land Office et al
as 1:2024cv00994
Plaintiff:
Rick Sims
Defendant:
Texas General Land Office and U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
