Civil Rights Cases filed in Indiana
Cases 151 - 160 of 18,505
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00186
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 117 Americans with Disabilites Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00374
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00563
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
CARR et al v. TRUSTEES OF PURDUE UNIVERSITY
as 1:2024cv00772
Plaintiff: STEVEN ALAN CARR and DAVID G. SCHUSTER
Defendant: TRUSTEES OF PURDUE UNIVERSITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00774
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act
BOGGS v. HOLMES et al
as 1:2024cv00784
Plaintiff: MATTHEW BOGGS
Defendant: CHASE HOLMES, JASON MYERS, TRAVIS KEMPTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Taebel v. Link
as 2:2024cv00124
Plaintiff: Mitch Taebel
Defendant: John A. Link
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00159
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Villegas v. Hancock Regional Hospital
as 2:2024cv00104
Plaintiff: Melissa Villegas
Defendant: Hancock Regional Hospital doing business as Great Lakes Healthcare Center and Hancock Regional Hospital as Owner and Operator of Hancock Regional Hospital doing business as Great Lakes Healthcare Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00485
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?