Cases 171 - 180 of 8,666
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv06544
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Worrick v. Hill et al
as 2:2024cv00415
Plaintiff:
Jedidiah Worrick
Defendant:
Rebecca Hill, Charles Turkle, Colleton County DSS Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv00275
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1982 Civil Rights Racial Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2023cv06353
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Von Fox v. Gergel et al
as 2:2023cv06273
Plaintiff:
Von Fox Glynndeavin and Glynndeavin Von Fox
Defendant:
Judge Richard Gergel and Judge Mary Gordon Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv06090
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Henry v. Thompson
as 4:2023cv06113
Plaintiff:
Patrick Henry, III
Defendant:
Phillip E Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Guess v. Brown et al
as 3:2023cv06408
Plaintiff:
Thurmond Guess, Sr.
Defendant:
Leonardo Brown, Darrell Jackson, Sr., Rose Ann English and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Singletary v. Cramer et al
as 2:2023cv06086
Plaintiff:
John Singletary
Defendant:
Isaac Cramer, Keith Rossoen, Thomas James Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973 - Voting Rights Act of 1965
Scipio v. Finklea, Hendrick & Blake, LLC et al
as 4:2023cv06088
Plaintiff:
Eshawn Jessica Scipio
Defendant:
Finklea, Hendrick & Blake, LLC, Gary I. Finklea, Charlie Blake, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
