Cases 11 - 20 of 8,692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv03311
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Lynch v. Thompson-Smith et al
as 3:2024cv03235
Plaintiff:
John D. Lynch, (II)
Defendant:
Essence Thompson-Smith, Rabee Ratarseh, WoodForest National Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sherwood v. Rollins et al
as 7:2024cv03257
Plaintiff:
Kim Marie Sherwood
Defendant:
Mark Rollins, Mark S Smith and Spartanburg County School District One
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv03231
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Lynch v. Pathward, N.A.
as 3:2024cv03199
Plaintiff:
John D. Lynch, (II)
Defendant:
Pathward, N.A., Routing # = 073972181
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Allen v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv03203
Plaintiff:
Thomas C. Jacobi Allen
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lynch v. J.G. Wentworth et al
as 3:2024cv03207
Plaintiff:
John D. Lynch, (II)
Defendant:
J.G. Wentworth, R.C. Henderson Trust a/k/a R.C. Henderson, Trust Subsidiary of Def. No. 2 and Securian Financial
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03212
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv03217
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2024cv03193
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
