Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Knierim v. Nichols et al
as 2:2019cv10661
Defendant:
Monroe County Circuit Court, Carl Christensen, MD, William McMullen and others
Plaintiff:
Donna Knierim
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mills v. Nichols et al
as 2:2019cv10649
Defendant:
Monroe County Circuit Court, Carl Christensen, MD, William McMullen and others
Plaintiff:
Angela Mills
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Clark v. William Paul Nichols et al
as 2:2019cv10639
Defendant:
Michael J St John, Michigan Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs, William McMullen and others
Plaintiff:
Tammy Clark for Richard Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Berry v. Nichols et al
as 2:2019cv10648
Defendant:
Monroe County Circuit Court, Carl Christensen, MD, William McMullen and others
Plaintiff:
Janet Berry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pompy et al v. Monroe Bank and Trust et al
as 2:2019cv10334
Defendant:
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Mutual Insurance Company, Ray Kisonas, Jessica Chaffin and others
Plaintiff:
Lesly Pompy and Interventional Pain management Associates, P.C.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00239
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112
Bartlett v. Federal Bureau of Investigation et al
as 1:2017cv01148
Plaintiff:
Angel Bartlett
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation, Timothy Robertson and Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00880
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv11178
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Nettles v. Michigan Supreme Court Clerk et al
as 1:2017cv00004
Plaintiff:
Beverley R. Nettles
Defendant:
Michigan Supreme Court Clerk, Larry S. Royster, Michigan Attorney Grievance Commission and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
