Cases 11 - 20 of 29
Blackburn v. Morris et al
as 2:2015cv01826
Plaintiff:
Danny Ray Blackburn
Defendant:
Virginia Morris , Virginia Brannen , Charles Benton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2015cv01060
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv02214
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv02842
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Nesbitt v. Kershaw County Sheriff's Office et al
as 3:2013cv01784
Plaintiff:
Jamie Tyler Nesbitt
Defendant:
Kershaw County Sheriff's Office , Jim Mathhews , Marvin Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2013cv01557
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Williams et al v. Berkeley Hall LLC et al
as 9:2013cv01352
Plaintiff:
Jayson Williams , Charles E Houston, Jr and Michael L Walters
Defendant:
Berkeley Hall LLC , Berkeley Hall Club Inc , Adrian Morris and others
Counter_claimant:
Berkeley Hall Club Inc and Adrian Morris
Counter_defendant:
Charles E Houston, Jr , Michael L Walters and Jayson Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Griffin v. South Carolina Department of Social Services et al
as 2:2012cv01950
Plaintiff:
Keith Lemart Griffin
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Social Services, North Charleston Police Department, Charleston County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv01795
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00334
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
