Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00452
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Roxanne Adams, Administrator of the Estate of Jamycheal M. Mitchell v. Naphcare, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv00229
Plaintiff:
Roxanne Adams, Administrator of the Estate of Jamycheal M. Mitchell
Defendant:
Naphcare, Inc., Nsekenene Kolongo, MD, Renee Edwards, LCSW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00258
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00562
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Barnes v. Johnson et al
as 3:2012cv00053
Plaintiff:
Faye Barnes
Defendant:
Johnathan Bernard Bland, Wendy Hobbs, John Jabe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Evans-El v. City of Norfolk, VA et al
as 2:2012cv00221
Plaintiff:
Vernon Christopher Evans-El
Defendant:
City of Norfolk, VA, John Doe, Officer Swears and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00875
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dickson v. Cherry et al
as 2:2010cv00225
Plaintiff:
John M. Dickson, Jr.
Defendant:
Roy Cherry, T. D. Hatchett, E. Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dickson v. Parker Correctional Officer et al
as 2:2010cv00134
Plaintiff:
John M. Dickson, Jr.
Defendant:
Parker, All John/Jane Does at Hampton Roads Regional Jail, Ralph Albaseau and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00703
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disability (Public Accomodations)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
