Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Nesbitt v. Kershaw County Sheriff's Office et al
as 3:2013cv01784
Plaintiff:
Jamie Tyler Nesbitt
Defendant:
Kershaw County Sheriff's Office , Jim Mathhews , Marvin Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hammett v. Dodd et al
as 7:2013cv00441
Plaintiff:
Brooks Hammett
Defendant:
Phillip L Dodd, John Doe 1 and John Doe 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00246
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2013cv00196
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv03569
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Norman v. Brooks et al
as 8:2012cv02862
Plaintiff:
Rahmad Norman
Defendant:
Gerald Brooks, Jermiah Atkins, Kevin Follow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv00390
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Faulkner et al v. Greenwood County et al
as 8:2011cv02557
Plaintiff:
Ruby Faulkner , Sallie Jones , William Faulkner and others
Defendant:
Greenwood County , Greenwood County Sheriff's Office , Tony Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cockrell et al v. Lexington County School District One et al
as 3:2011cv02042
Plaintiff:
Justin Brooks Cockrell and David Cockrell
Defendant:
John Doe, Len Doe and James Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patterson v. Goldsmith et al
as 0:2011cv00475
Plaintiff:
Patricia T Patterson
Defendant:
Brooks P Goldsmith and AutoZone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
