Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Morton v. City of Guntersville, Alabama et al
as 5:2010cv01658
Plaintiff:
Alex Wayne Morton
Defendant:
City of Guntersville, Alabama, Jeremy Kirkwood and Tim Nugent
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fowler v. Blount County Commission et al
as 2:2010cv00969
Plaintiff:
Mark Fowler
Defendant:
Blount County Commission , Loyd Arrington and Danny Morton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Armstrong v. Morton et al
as 2:2009cv02470
Plaintiff:
Lagenia Carolyn Armstrong
Defendant:
Danny Morton, J G Poole, T E Neill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv01658
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
K.I. et al v. Montgomery County Board of Education et al
as 2:2009cv00752
Plaintiff:
K. I. and Brenda Irby
Defendant:
Montgomery County Board of Education, John Dilworth, Clay Slagle and others
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Fowler v. Arrington et al
as 2:2009cv01587
Plaintiff:
Mark Fowler and Mark Fowler
Defendant:
Loyd Arrington, Danny Morton, Blount County Commission and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00701
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Montgomery County Board of Education et al (MAG+)
as 2:2008cv00847
Plaintiff:
Brian Williams
Defendant:
Montgomery County Board of Education, Montgomery County Board of Education, Joseph B. Morton and others
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401 Education: Handicapped Child Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv01074
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Lind v. Morton
as 2:2008cv00919
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Lind
Defendant:
Danny Morton
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
