Cases 11 - 20 of 94
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv07602
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
OUAZIZ v. MODDY et al
as 2:2023cv00046
Plaintiff:
BOUAZZA OUAZIZ
Defendant:
TAWANA MODDY, WILLIAM OLSZEWSKI, SERGEANT DARREN SORRENTINO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
OUAZIZ v. CITY OF JERSEY et al
as 2:2022cv04546
Plaintiff:
BOUAZZA OUAZIZ
Defendant:
CITY OF JERSEY, TAWANA MODDY, CHIEF OF JERSEY CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv01655
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
DAVIS v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2022cv03755
Plaintiff:
CARLENE DAVIS
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, COUNTY OF ESSEX and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
PEREZ et al v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK et al
as 2:2022cv04173
Defendant:
FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION, JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION and others
Plaintiff:
ALEJANDRO VICENTE PEREZ and CATHLEEN HANENBERG PEREZ
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv20250
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv12207
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
DOE v. MCELROY et al
as 2:2021cv17956
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE
Defendant:
LARRICK MCELROY, DEVOUGHN MOORE, GUSTAVO FRANCA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DEAN v. J. BISSELL et al
as 2:2021cv09770
Defendant:
BELL JR., TOWNSHIP OF CEDAR GROVE, JOZSA and others
Plaintiff:
RYAN DEAN
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
