Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Ramirez v. Chow et al
as 3:2012cv05630
Plaintiff:
Maricela Ramirez
Defendant:
Alexander Chow, Van Huyn, Mark Hubbard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ramirez v. US District Court et al
as 2:2012cv00534
Plaintiff:
Manuel Ramirez
Defendant:
US District Court and Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henry v. Atoch et al
as 3:2011cv05740
Plaintiff:
William F. Henry
Defendant:
Brandon Atoch , City of Oakville , Grays Harbor County and others
Counter_claimant:
City of Oakville
Counter_defendant:
William F. Henry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ramirez v. United States of America
as 2:2011cv00032
Plaintiff:
Manuel Ramirez
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Friedmann v. State of Washington et al
as 3:2009cv05761
Plaintiff:
Michael Alexander Friedmann
Defendant:
State of Washington, Christine Gregoire, Washington State Patrol and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ramirez v. United States of America
as 2:2009cv01290
Plaintiff:
Manuel Ramirez
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jimenez v. City of Olympia et al
as 3:2009cv05363
Plaintiff:
Maria Jimenez, Jose Ramirez Jimenez Estate of and Jose Ramirez
Defendant:
City of Olympia, Paul Bakala, Mike Hovda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ramirez-Gomez v. City of Yakima et al
as 2:2009cv03024
Plaintiff:
Herminio Ramirez-Gomez
Defendant:
City of Yakima, Bruce Rogers, Jane Doe Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv05761
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv03044
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
