Cases 11 - 20 of 173
McCurry v. Thomas et al
as 2:2023cv00130
Plaintiff:
Agness McCurry
Defendant:
D Kelly Thomas, Joseph Ahillen, Roger Page and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Puckett et al v. Unicoi County Tennessee et al
as 2:2023cv00123
Plaintiff:
Jerry Michael Puckett, Andrew Joseph Puckett and G.R.P.
Defendant:
Unicoi County Tennessee, City of Erwin, Tennessee, Michael Hensley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dalton v. Johnston et al
as 2:2023cv00012
Plaintiff:
Justin L. Dalton
Defendant:
Dee Johnston, Jefferson City Police Department, Andrew Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Whyte v. Hazley et al
as 3:2023cv00122
Plaintiff:
Darrell Ricardo Whyte
Defendant:
Andrew Hazley, Will Fraley, f/n/u Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Atkins v. Sword et al
as 3:2023cv00003
Plaintiff:
Robert J Atkins
Defendant:
Steven Sword, Mary Ward, Hector Sanchez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Graves v. ACIST Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2022cv00159
Plaintiff:
Andrew Graves
Defendant:
ACIST Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01037
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Braseel v. Grundy County Government et al (TV2)
as 1:2022cv00298
Plaintiff:
Adam Braseel
Defendant:
Grundy County Government, Estate of Brent Myers, Lonnie Cleek and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Tackett v. Pieri et al
as 3:2022cv00798
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Tackett
Defendant:
Andrew Pieri and City of Millersville, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Farris v. Voss
as 1:2022cv00248
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Farris
Defendant:
Andrew Warren Voss
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
