Civil Rights Cases filed in Georgia
Cases 11 - 20 of 231
The State of Georgia v. Adams
as 1:2023cv04660
Plaintiff: The State of Georgia
Defendant: Joseph Adams
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03447
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (other)
JACKSON v. SKAMARYCZ et al
as 3:2023cv00081
Plaintiff: KRISTI C JACKSON
Defendant: JESSICA A SKAMARYCZ and STACY W ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BROWN v. HOOKS We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv00095
Plaintiff: MICHAEL B BROWN and MASON B BROWN
Defendant: ROBERT HOOKS, KERTAVIOUS COPPINS, AARON GUILLAUME and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Arnold v. FC Hunters Glen et al
as 1:2023cv01913
Plaintiff: Kimberly Arnold
Defendant: FC Hunters Glen doing business as Waters Edge Apartments, Weller Management, Adam Joffe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Glass v. Purdue et al
as 1:2023cv01868
Plaintiff: Kardarius Kantrez Glass
Defendant: Sonny Purdue, Davyd L. Mincey and Adam Kaye
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Glass v. Raffensperger et al
as 1:2023cv01865
Plaintiff: Kardarius Kantrez Glass
Defendant: Brad Raffensperger, Davyd L. Mincey and Adam Kaye
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Glass v. Kemp et al
as 1:2023cv01866
Plaintiff: Kardarius Kantrez Glass
Defendant: Brian P. Kemp, Davyd L. Mincey and Adam Kaye
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Glass v. Deal et al
as 1:2023cv01864
Plaintiff: Kardarius Kantrez Glass
Defendant: Nathan Deal, Davyd L. Mincey and Adam Kaye
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00060
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?