Cases 11 - 20 of 106
Perryman v. Bloomington et al
as 0:2023cv01984
Plaintiff:
Kylese Perryman
Defendant:
City of Bloomington, Does 1-10; individuals that are employees or agents of the Bloomington Police Department, Detective Andrew Risdall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv01816
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Gibbons v. Bjorkland et al
as 0:2023cv01508
Plaintiff:
Andrew J. Gibbons
Defendant:
Ethan C. Bjorkland, Melinda Erwin, John Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv01256
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv00905
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv00747
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12111 Americans with Disabilities Act - Employment
Gofan v. Gustafson et al
as 0:2023cv00749
Plaintiff:
Saye Henry Gofan, Jr.
Defendant:
Cameron C. Gustafson, Ryan Olson, William Aldrich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bligh v. Ruden et al
as 0:2023cv00095
Plaintiff:
Amy Julia Bligh
Defendant:
Andrew Ruden and Nicholas Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Warren v. Forney et al
as 0:2023cv00070
Plaintiff:
Darrell Warren
Defendant:
Meg Forney, Andrew Klein and Karl Zabinski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
K.J. v. City of Waseca et al
as 0:2023cv00002
Plaintiff:
K. J. and K.J.
Defendant:
City of Waseca, Police Chief Penny Vought, Police Officer Andrew Harren and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
