Cases 11 - 20 of 63
Thomason v. Drug Enforcement Administration et al
as 2:2021cv01891
Plaintiff:
Tommy D Thomason
Defendant:
Drug Enforcement Administration and Arizona Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00237
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Heffington v. Arizona Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2020cv00107
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Corrections, Charles L Ryan, Gerald Thompson and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Heffington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Day v. Lockerby et al
as 2:2019cv05757
Defendant:
Antwan Whitlow, Neural Ink, Mark Brnovich and others
Plaintiff:
Dillia Marcile Day
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv01814
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv01536
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv04298
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Guardian News & Media LLC, et al v. Charles Ryan
as 17-17083
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GUARDIAN NEWS & MEDIA LLC, ASSOCIATED PRESS, ARIZONA REPUBLIC, a division of Phoenix Newspapers Incorporated and others
Defendant / Appellee:
CHARLES L. RYAN, Director of the Arizona Department of Corrections
Guardian News & Media LLC, et al v. Charles Ryan
as 17-17083
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GUARDIAN NEWS & MEDIA LLC, ASSOCIATED PRESS, ARIZONA REPUBLIC, a division of Phoenix Newspapers Incorporated and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES L. RYAN, Warden, Director of the Arizona Department of Corrections
Land v. El Mirage Police Department et al
as 2:2017cv03169
Plaintiff:
Ashley Land
Defendant:
El Mirage Police Department, Unknown Chairez, Charles Franklin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
