Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Sherno v. Anoka County et al
as 0:2014cv00982
Defendant:
Anoka County , City of Apple Valley , City of Arlington and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Wallace Sherno
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Barghini v. Anoka County et al
as 0:2014cv00297
Plaintiff:
Laureen Cay Barghini
Defendant:
Anoka County , Bloomington, City of , Brainerd, City of and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Nyhus v. City of Blaine et al
as 0:2013cv02878
Defendant:
City of Blaine , City of Bloomington , City of Brainerd and others
Plaintiff:
Natalie Ann Nyhus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2013cv02748
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Roschen et al v. Wabasha County et al
as 0:2013cv02490
Plaintiff:
Debra Roschen , James Roschen , Megan Roschen and others
Defendant:
Wabasha County , Anoka County , Anoka County Community Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2013cv02160
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Mitchell v. Aitkin County et al
as 0:2013cv02167
Plaintiff:
Dawn Mitchell
Defendant:
Aitkin County , City of Aitkin , Anoka County and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2012cv02007
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Sampair et al v. Birchwood, City of et al
as 0:2009cv00669
Plaintiff:
Anthony Sampair, Laurie Sampair, John Doe and others
Defendant:
Birchwood, City of, Birchwood, City of, White Bear Lake Conservation District and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Cartier v. George et al
as 0:2008cv01323
Plaintiff:
John Richard Cartier and John Richard Cartier
Defendant:
Ryan George, Ryan Arbuckle and White Bear Lake, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
