Civil Rights Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 11 - 20 of 658
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00327
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00134
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv05000
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
JOHNSON v. PROSPECT MEDICA HOLDINGS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv00494
Plaintiff: THEMA JOHNSON
Defendant: PROSPECT MEDICA HOLDINGS, SAMUEL SANG-BUM LEE, JIM BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MITCHELL v. BROWN et al
as 2:2024cv00336
Plaintiff: PAUL F. MITCHELL
Defendant: JAZMIN BROWN, OUR BROTHERS PLACE, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. MUHAMMAD
as 2:2023cv05155
Plaintiff: SHAWN BROWN
Defendant: SAMEERAH MUHAMMAD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00082
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
PLAPPERT v. CLINK et al
as 2:2023cv04628
Plaintiff: DAVID PLAPPERT
Defendant: PO RICK CLINK and PO HARRY BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04815
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Brown et al v. Stoner et al
as 1:2023cv01886
Plaintiff: Elizabeth Sarah Brown and Daniel Lynn Brown
Defendant: Adams County Courtney Stoner, Tyler R. Krause, Jason Gueck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?