Cases 11 - 20 of 99
Vanderlinden v. City of Warren et al
as 2:2022cv11060
Plaintiff:
Joel Vanderlinden
Defendant:
City of Warren, Mayor James Fouts, Jerry Bell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Holloway #159258 v. Bell et al
as 1:2022cv00428
Plaintiff:
Randy Holloway #159258
Defendant:
Robert Holmes Bell, Timothy P. Greeley and Solomon Radner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Mendez v. AT&T Inc.
as 2:2022cv11010
Plaintiff:
Monica L. Mendez
Defendant:
AT&T Inc., Michigan Bell Telephone Company and AT&T Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Bell v. Sault Tribe of Chippewa Indians et al
as 2:2022cv00069
Plaintiff:
Dawn R. Bell
Defendant:
Sault Tribe of Chippewa Indians, Sault Ste. Marie Police Department, Sault Ste. Marie, City of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Bell v. Sault Tribe of Chippewa Indians et al
as 3:2022cv10502
Plaintiff:
Dawn R. Bell
Defendant:
Sault Tribe of Chippewa Indians, Sault Ste Marie Police Department, Sault Ste Marie, City of and others
Bell v. KMG Management Prestige et al
as 2:2022cv10501
Plaintiff:
Dawn Renee Bell
Defendant:
KMG Management Prestige, HUD Housing and Urban Development, State Police Department and others
Novak v. Madison Heights, City of et al
as 2:2022cv10315
Plaintiff:
Nicholas W. Novak
Defendant:
Madison Heights, City of, Madison Heights Police Department, Jordan Rieck and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv10046
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
v. Fort Iron & Metal Company et al
as 2:2021cv12885
Defendant:
Fort Iron & Metal Company, City of Detroit and David Bell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Fort Iron & Metal Company v. City of Detroit et al
as 2:2021cv12886
Plaintiff:
Fort Iron & Metal Company
Defendant:
City of Detroit and David Bell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
