Cases 11 - 20 of 41
Palmer v. York County Pennsylvania et al
as 1:2020cv00539
Defendant:
Dr. Rameen Starling-Roney, John Doe Prison Guards 1-10, President Judge Joseph Adams and others
Plaintiff:
Rose Palmer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SAUNDERS v. RALEIGH COUNTY et al
as 2:2020cv00016
Defendant:
CHARLES R. HUMPHREY, THEE HONORABLE ADAM DIMLICH, CITY OF BECKLEY and others
Plaintiff:
RAYCO SAUNDERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv04951
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MILLER v. MARSHALL et al
as 2:2019cv00880
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL P. MILLER, JR.
Defendant:
JOHN MARSHALL and RICHARD BOWER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ARISON et al v. FAYETTE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
as 2:2018cv00845
Defendant:
ANGELA ZIMMERLINK, RICH BOWER, FAYETTE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA and others
Plaintiff:
DANTE RIPLEY, MIRANDA ARISON, CHARLES SMITH, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MARINKOVIC v. BATTAGLIA et al
as 2:2018cv00388
Plaintiff:
MEL MARINKOVIC
Defendant:
DAVID K. BATTAGLIA, ROBERT T. BOWER, RICHARD L. FINK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOWERS v. LANCASTER TOWNSHIP et al
as 2:2017cv01508
Plaintiff:
KENT C. BOWERS
Defendant:
LANCASTER TOWNSHIP and DAVID SITLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIS v. NEW HOLLAND BOROUGH, LANCASTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 5:2017cv05034
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER JAMES DAVIS
Defendant:
NEW HOLLAND BOROUGH, LANCASTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA , DONALD L. BOWERS, JR. , WENDELL L. METZLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv04950
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00195
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
