Cases 11 - 20 of 29
Bowden v. Rimsky et al
as 1:2020cv00929
Defendant:
Brian Schnier, City of Chicago, Nicholas Boyle and others
Plaintiff:
Patrick Bowden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Talavera v. Merola et al
as 1:2020cv00855
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Matthew M. Zeiger, Martin J. Boyle and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Talavera
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Calderon v. Village of Bridgeview, Illinois et al
as 1:2018cv08277
Plaintiff:
Abraham Calderon
Defendant:
Unknown Male Monterrey Employee No 233, Genevieve Marie Lefevour, Village of Bridgeview, Illinois and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Tate et al v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2018cv07439
Defendant:
Jennifer Burmistrz, James D. Cascone, Michael Higgins and others
Plaintiff:
Legend Booth, E'Monie Booth, Ebony Tate and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boyle v. Village of Stockton et al.
as 3:2017cv50121
Plaintiff:
Owen Patrick Boyle
Defendant:
The Village Of Stockton and Sean Patridge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Boyle v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2017cv00244
Plaintiff:
Jerry Boyle
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Garry McCarthy, John Escalante and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv03332
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Boyle v. Mikos et al
as 1:2014cv04206
Plaintiff:
Robert James Boyle
Defendant:
Ronald Mikos, Village of Plainfield, IL and Plainfield, IL Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv02496
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01033
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
