Cases 11 - 20 of 55
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01941
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Camacho v. Alliant Credit Union
as 5:2022cv01690
Plaintiff:
Yuliana Camacho
Defendant:
Alliant Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Brian Vasquez v. City of Baldwin Park et al
as 2:2021cv05588
Plaintiff:
Brian Vasquez
Defendant:
City of Baldwin Park, Officer Alex Asencio, #4430, Officer Eric Camacho. #4415 and others
Debtor In Possession:
DOES 1-25, inclusive,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES et al
as 2:2021cv05226
Petitioner:
Camacho, David Sprenger and COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moheb Bottros v. County of Los Angeles, et al
as 2:2021cv05227
Petitioner:
Lt. camacho, David Sprenger, Moheb Bottros and others
Defendant:
Captain David J. Sprenger and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02092
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Rouse v. Donahue
as 3:2020cv06068
Defendant:
FBI Agent Julie Lockard, Napa Sheriff Department Operations and Training Policies, Brian Donahue and others
Plaintiff:
Xezakia Rouse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dahmeer Williams v. City of Los Angeles
as 2:2020cv06961
Plaintiff:
Dahmeer Williams
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles, Officer Jorge Gutierrez, Officer Joshua Camacho and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Camacho v. Mountain Lion Acquisitions, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv02440
Defendant:
Mountain Lion Acquisitions, Inc. and Erfan Samsam Shariat, Esq.
Plaintiff:
Luis Camacho
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00056
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
