Cases 11 - 20 of 27
Carr v. Tate et al (TV2)
as 2:2019cv00043
Defendant:
Travis B Holly, Schatz & Associates, Richard Slaydon and others
Plaintiff:
Charles E Carr, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crowe et al v. Randles et al
as 3:2018cv00530
Defendant:
Bonnie Hommrich, James Moore, Wendy Patrick and others
Plaintiff:
A.C., L.C., E.B. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
State of Tennessee v. Carr (PLR1)
as 3:2018cv00450
Petitioner:
State of Tennessee
Respondent:
Mark Carr
Defendant:
Rick Crowe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ingram v. Tennessee Department of Health et al
as 3:2017cv01565
Plaintiff:
Alton Earl Ingram, Jr.
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Health, Tennessee Board of Medical Examiners, Andrea Huddleston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown et al v. The Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2016cv02737
Plaintiff:
Kelly Brown , Robert Brown and Shana Claud-West
Defendant:
The Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, Tennessee and Fred Carr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carr v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, Tennessee
as 3:2016cv00002
Plaintiff:
Gionni Carr
Defendant:
Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Raines v. Carr et al (PLR2)
as 3:2015cv00410
Plaintiff:
Sandra Raines
Defendant:
Ralph Carr , Jack H Baldwin and City of Pigeon Forge, Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Carr et al v. TransCanada USA Services, Inc.
as 3:2014cv01084
Plaintiff:
Danny Carr , James Ethridge and Bailey Hankins, Jr.
Defendant:
TransCanada USA Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv03016
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00926
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
