Cases 11 - 20 of 43
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2020cv00037
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Marvin v. United States Bureau of Prisons et al
as 4:2020cv00168
Defendant:
Jane Doe, United States Bureau of Prisons, Kathleen Hawk Sawyer and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Marvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carr v. Morin
as 2:2019cv00116
Plaintiff:
Willie Tyrone Carr
Defendant:
Brad Morin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Carr v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services et al
as 3:2019cv00876
Defendant:
Child Protective Services, Texas Department of Family and Protective Services and Regina Moore
Plaintiff:
JaAvier I Carr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sharpless v. Carr
as 3:2018cv02964
Plaintiff:
Dennis Clay Sharpless
Defendant:
Darrall Carr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Carr v. Civil Rights Project et al
as 4:2018cv03551
Defendant:
Civil Rights Project, 7031 Koll Center, US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and others
Plaintiff:
Lord of the Streets Raymond E Carr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Carr v. The City of Spring Valley Village et al
as 4:2018cv02585
Defendant:
Jerry Hanson, Memorial Village, Nathan Frazier and others
Plaintiff:
Lakita Carr, Estate of Darrall Thomas and ANGELINA LEFFYEAR, AS NEXT FRIEND FOR D.T., JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv01937
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Carr v. Director of the TDCJ et al
as 4:2018cv00435
Plaintiff:
Raymond E Carr
Defendant:
Director of the TDCJ, Director of Board of Pardons and Paroles, Director of Ombudsman TDCJ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Zadeh v. Pease et al
as 4:2017cv00219
Defendant:
Sharon Pease, Belinda West, Mari Robinson and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Zadeh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
