Cases 11 - 20 of 146
Murarik v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2023cv01364
Plaintiff:
Jody Murarik
Defendant:
Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, Fraser Blake, Scott Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02557
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
SINGHA v. CITIZENS BANK et al
as 2:2023cv01101
Plaintiff:
EBENEZER MOHAN SINGHA
Defendant:
CITIZENS BANK, MS. GRACE LORAS, MR. YUAN CARTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Civil Rights: Other
Carter v. Hayes et al
as 1:2023cv00312
Plaintiff:
Michael Carter
Defendant:
Megan Hayes and Adams County Probation Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Allen et al v. Salem Township
as 3:2023cv00249
Plaintiff:
Scott Allen, Troy Campbell, Rose Campbell and others
Defendant:
Salem Township
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01787
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01429
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv03542
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv04026
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Violation 5th & 14th Amendment
Randolph v. City of Harrisburg et al
as 1:2022cv01239
Plaintiff:
Samuel Randolph
Defendant:
City of Harrisburg, Robert Fegan, Donald Heffner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
