Civil Rights Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 64
Tonya Bowles, et al v. Eric Sabree, et al
as 23-1256
Plaintiff / Appellee: TONYA BOWLES, for herself and all those similarly situated and BRUCE TAYLOR, for himself and all those similarly situated
Defendant / Appellant: ERIC R. SABREE, in his official and personal capacity and WAYNE COUNTY, MI BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, also sometimes known as Charter County of Wayne by its Board of Commissioners
Defendant: OAKLAND COUNTY, MI BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS and ANDREW E. MEISNER, in his official and personal capacities
Tonya Bowles, et al v. Eric Sabree, et al
as 23-1030
Plaintiff / Appellee: TONYA BOWLES, for herself and all those similarly situated and BRUCE TAYLOR, for himself and all those similarly situated
Defendant / Appellant: ERIC R. SABREE, in his official and personal capacity and WAYNE COUNTY, MI BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, also sometimes known as Charter County of Wayne by its Board of Commissioners
Defendant / Appellee: OAKLAND COUNTY, MI BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
PARKER v. HAALAND et al
as 2:2022cv05049
Plaintiff: JAMAL DARIUS PARKER Moor Beneficiary a Emperor, a Noble a Merchant, Admiral, Piloter, Seaman, Mariner, Shereef in propria persona Sui Juris, majoris aetatis suae d/b/a Jamal El Trust
Defendant: DEBRA ANNE HAALAND d/b/a Debra Anne Haaland, secretary of the interior et al.,, MERRICK BRIAN GARLAND d/b/a MERRICK GARLAND attorney general et al.,, ANDREW MARSHALL SAUL d/b/a ANDREW SAUL commissioner et al., and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tonya Bowles, et al v. Eric Sabree, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-1912
Plaintiff / Appellee: TONYA BOWLES, for herself and all those similarly situated and BRUCE TAYLOR, for himself and all those similarly situated
Defendant / Appellant: ERIC R. SABREE, in his official and personal capacity, WAYNE COUNTY, MI BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, also sometimes known as Charter County of Wayne by its Board of Commissioners, OAKLAND COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS and others
Martin et al v. County of Wayne et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2022cv06399
Plaintiff: Christina Martin and Jaden Williams
Cross Claimant: County of Wayne, Wayne County Sheriff's Office and Wayne County Deputy Sheriff John Does #1-10
Cross Defendant: Village of Newark, Village of Newark Police Department and Village of Newark Police Officer John Does #11-20
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jamal Parker v. Antony Blinken, et al
as 22-16331
Plaintiff / Appellant: JAMAL DARIUS PARKER, Moor beneficiary, in personam, a Emperor, Admiral Marine, Merchant Piloter, AKA Jamal El Trust, DBA Jamal Darius Parker
Defendant / Appellee: ANTONY BLINKEN, Secretary of State, United States Department of State, Heirs and Assignees, DEBRA ANNE HAALAND, Secretary of the Interior, Department of the Interior, Heirs and Assignees, MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice, Heirs and Assignees and others
Chase, Jr. v. Wayne County et al
as 6:2022cv06265
Plaintiff: Chase Sydney and Sydney L. Chase, Jr
Defendant: Wayne County, Wayne County Jail, Wayne County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Ward v. County of Wayne et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv12742
Plaintiff: Ramon Ward
Defendant: County of Wayne, Robert Agacinski, Nancy Westveld and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. County of Wayne et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv12070
Plaintiff: Larry Smith
Defendant: County of Wayne, Robert J Donaldson, Monica Childs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GAROUFALIS v. County of Wayne et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2021cv10170
Defendant: MARY HUMES, MICHELE INEZ DIGGS, Raphael Washington and others
Plaintiff: NICHOLAS GAROUFALIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?