Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01211
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv14068
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00267
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00266
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754
BBF Engineering Services, PC et al v. State of Michigan et al
as 2:2011cv14853
Plaintiff:
Bellandra Foster and BBF Engineering Services, PC
Defendant:
Michigan, State of , Michigan Department of Transportation , Victor Judnic and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703
Richmond Transport, Inc. et al v. United States Department of Transportation, et al
as 2:2011cv13771
Plaintiff:
Richmond Transport, Inc. , Manchik Properties, Inc. and Northeast Aggregate, Inc.
Defendant:
United States Department of Transportation, Jospeh E Austin, Michigan Department of Transporation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murry v. Detroit Department of Transportation et al
as 2:2011cv11498
Plaintiff:
Calvin Murry
Defendant:
Detroit Department of Transportation and John Doe
Rasins Landscape and Associates, Inc., v. Michigan Department of Transportation
as 2:2010cv14544
Plaintiff:
Rasins Landscape and Associates, Inc.,
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Transportation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00346
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12111 American Disability Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2008cv13770
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
