Cases 11 - 20 of 20
HOLMES v. KAZMIERCZAK et al
as 2:2020cv01541
Defendant:
EDWARD KAZMIERCZAK, JOHN DOE and TARA KILDUFF
Plaintiff:
DUANE HOLMES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv13119
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
KAMDEM-OUAFFO v. CAMPBELL'S SOUP COMPANY et al
as 1:2018cv00298
Plaintiff:
RICKY KAMDEM-OUAFFO
Defendant:
CAMPBELL'S SOUP COMPANY , TASK MANAGEMENT INC. , DENISE M. MORRISON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv02291
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HUNTINGTON KNOLLS, L.L.C v. HOLLAND TOWNSHIP PLANNING BOARD et al
as 3:2015cv01627
Plaintiff:
HUNTINGTON KNOLLS, L.L.C
Defendant:
HOLLAND TOWNSHIP PLANNING BOARD, TOWNSHIP OF HOLLAND , DANIEL BUSH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
TORO-HARTMAN v. CITY OF PLEASANTVILLE et al
as 1:2014cv03846
Plaintiff:
ALMA TORO-HARTMAN
Defendant:
CITY OF PLEASANTVILLE , DUANE COMEAUX and ROCKY MELENDEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOZELLE v. THE CITY OF PLEASANTVILLE et al
as 1:2012cv01700
Plaintiff:
TYRONE L. MOZELLE
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PLEASANTVILLE, THE PLEASANTVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, DUANE N. COMEAUX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv07638
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 41 U.S.C. § 1463
OGLESBY v. CITY OF PLEASANTVILLE et al
as 1:2010cv03271
Plaintiff:
CHARLES OGLESBY
Defendant:
CITY OF PLEASANTVILLE , CITY OF PLEASANTVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT , CHIEF DUANE COMEAUX and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
HORTON v. CITY OF PLEASANTVILLE et al
as 1:2009cv02757
Plaintiff:
FORREST S. HORTON
Defendant:
CITY OF PLEASANTVILLE, DUANE M. COMEAUX, RICHARD MOORE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
