Cases 11 - 17 of 17
Riki O'Hailpin, et al v. Hawaiian Airlines, Inc., et al
as 22-15558
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RIKI O'HAILPIN, NINA ARIZUMI, ROBERT ESPINOSA and others
Defendant / Appellee:
HAWAIIAN AIRLINES, INC. and HAWAIIAN HOLDINGS, INC.
The Heidi Group, Inc. v. Texas Health and Human Services Commission et al
as 1:2022cv00294
Plaintiff:
The Heidi Group, Inc.
Defendant:
Texas Health and Human Services Commission, Cecile Erwin Young, Office of the Inspector General of the Texas Health and Human Services Commission and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - 42:1983 Civil Rights
Riki O'Hailpin, et al v. Hawaiian Airlines, Inc., et al
as 22-15215
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RIKI O'HAILPIN, NINA ARIZUMI, ROBERT ESPINOSA and others
Defendant / Appellee:
HAWAIIAN AIRLINES, INC. and HAWAIIAN HOLDINGS, INC.
O'Hailpin v. Hawaiian Airlines, Inc.
as 1:2022cv00007
Plaintiff:
Riki O'Hailpin, Nina Arizumi, Robert Espinosa and others
Defendant:
Hawaiian Airlines, Inc. and Hawaiian Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Whole Woman's Health et al v. Jackson et al
as 1:2021cv00616
Plaintiff:
Whole Woman's Health, Alamo City Surgery Center PLLC on behalf of itself, its staff, physicians, nurses, and patients doing business as Alamo Women's Reproductive Services, Alamo Women's Reproductive Services and others
Defendant:
Judge Austin Reeve Jackson, Penny Clarkston, Mark Lee Dickson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman et al v. Wilson et al
as 1:2020cv00847
Defendant:
Michelle Alletto, Maurice McCreary, Phil Wilson and others
Plaintiff:
Dorena Coleman, Curtis Jackson and Frederico Perez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers v. Rivera et al
as 1:2015cv00007
Defendant:
Martin Rivera, Erwin Young and Ron Saavedra
Plaintiff:
Paul Rogers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
