Civil Rights Cases
Cases 11 - 18 of 18
CAMM v. FAITH et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2014cv00123
Defendant: JAMES BIDDLE, SEAN CLEMONS, RODNEY ENGLERT and others
Plaintiff: DAVID R. CAMM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GENTRY et al v. FLOYD COUNTY, INDIANA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2014cv00054
Defendant: OFFICER ATHERTON, JOHN/JANE DOE, FLOYD COUNTY, INDIANA and others
Plaintiff: TABITHA GENTRY, MICHAEL HERRON, VINCENT MINTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
STORMS v. FLOYD COUNTY INDIANA et al
as 4:2013cv00143
Defendant: ROBERT ARCHIBALD, KEISHA BROOKS, ETHAN BROWN and others
Plaintiff: ASHLEY STORMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WELLS v. FLOYD COUNTY, INDIANA et al
as 4:2010cv00138
Defendant: FLOYD COUNTY, INDIANA, DARRELL MILLS and EUGENE D. PERROT
Plaintiff: JAMES T. WELLS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv00118
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
DOE et al v. PROSECUTOR, MARION COUNTY, INDIANA et al
as 1:2008cv00436
Plaintiff: JOHN DOE and STEVE MORRIS
Defendant: PROSECUTOR, MARION COUNTY, INDIANA, MAYOR, CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, PROSECUTOR AND SHERIFF OF SCOTT COUNTY, INDIANA and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Civil Rights None
NATION v. HUBBARD et al
as 4:2007cv00119
Plaintiff: SEAN PAUL NATION
Defendant: RANDY HUBBARD, RUSS WYATT and FLOYD COUNTY INDIANA SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WALKER v. FLOYD COUNTY INDIANA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2007cv00014
Plaintiff: PAMELA WALKER, PAMELA WALKER, PAMELA WALKER and others
Defendant: FLOYD COUNTY INDIANA, FLOYD COUNTY INDIANA, DARRELL MILLS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?