Cases 11 - 20 of 138
George Falcone v. Neil Dickstein, et al
as 22-2701
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GEORGE FALCONE
Defendant / Appellee:
NEIL DICKSTEIN, Personally and in his capacity as the Superintendent of Freehold Public Schools, FREEHOLD TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT and MYROSLAV ALFELDI, Personally and in his capacity as a freehold township police officer
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv05049
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
FALCONE v. DICKSTEIN et al
as 3:2022cv00921
Plaintiff:
GEORGE FALCONE
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT NEIL DICKSTEIN, MICHELLE LAMBERT, MICHAEL S. AMOROSO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00107
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
WHITLEY v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2021cv20243
Defendant:
DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, BUREAU OF CHILDRENS SERVICES and others
Plaintiff:
PATRICK R. WHITLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv15343
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SINGH v. FREEHOLD POLICE DEPT. et al
as 3:2021cv10451
Defendant:
NICHOLAS A. MOSCHELLA and FREEHOLD POLICE DEPT.
Plaintiff:
AMARDEEP SINGH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv08647
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv17285
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401
AURIEMMA V. BLOOMFIELD MUNICIPAL COURT, et al.
as 2:2020cv02612
Defendant:
ESSEX COUNTY FEE ARBITRATION, ESSEX COUNTY ETHICS COMMITTEE, BRICK MUNICIPALITY and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY AURIEMMA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
