Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Currie v. Andrews et al
as 2:2016cv14153
Plaintiff:
Marlon Currie
Defendant:
Thomas Andrews, Michigan, State of, United States of America and others
Studstill El v. Floyd-King
as 2:2016cv14068
Plaintiff:
Herbert Studstill El
Defendant:
Jalita Floyd-King
Hardrick et al v. City of Detroit et al
as 2:2015cv13884
Plaintiff:
Floyd Allen Hardrick, Jr. , Bianca Peterson , Theresa Robinson and others
Defendant:
Detroit, City of , Detroit Animal Control , Detroit Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv13070
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Rondeau v. Detroit Public Schools et al
as 2:2015cv11949
Plaintiff:
Dominique Rondeau
Defendant:
Detroit Public Schools, Freddy Wilson and Floyd Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crawford v. Hagel et al
as 1:2014cv00539
Plaintiff:
Floyd Crawford
Defendant:
Chuck Hagel and United States Department of Defense
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791
Students for Life at Eastern Michigan University v. Parker et al
as 2:2013cv11221
Plaintiff:
Students for Life at Eastern Michigan University
Defendant:
Francine Parker, Mike Morris, Floyd Clack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01107
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap)
Floyd #188158 v. Pottawatomi Indians of Michigan, Band of et al
as 1:2012cv00274
Plaintiff:
Kevin Floyd #188158
Defendant:
Pottawatomi Indians of Michigan, Band of, David K. Sprague and Unknown Part(y)(ies)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stephens v. S & S Services Property Management Company, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv10904
Plaintiff:
Floyd Stephens
Defendant:
S & S Services Property Management Company, Inc. , S & S Services, Inc. and Silvio Scappaticci
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
