Cases 11 - 20 of 121
Cebe v. Zola et al
as 3:2022cv01570
Plaintiff:
Mackenson Cebe
Defendant:
Joseph D. Zola, Judge Fred Parantoni, Joseph F. Saporitor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe v. Williamsport Area School District et al
as 4:2022cv01387
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Williamsport Area School District, Lycoming County, Dr. Brandon Pardoe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rahman v. Pierantoni
as 3:2022cv01253
Plaintiff:
Farida B. Rahman
Defendant:
Judge Fred A. Pierantoni
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02325
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
PYLE v. UPPER CHICHESTER TOWNSHIP et al
as 2:2022cv01715
Defendant:
UPPER CHICHESTER TOWNSHIP, DOMINIC J VENUTI, FRED C RHODES, JR and others
Plaintiff:
JEREMY PYLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SCHOTT, JR. v. TOWNSHIP et al
as 2:2022cv00230
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR SCHOTT, JR.
Defendant:
UPPER CHICHESTER TOWNSHIP, PFC FRED C RHODES, JR. and UPPER CHICHESTER TOWSHIP PFC FRED C. RHODES, JR. #38
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Gavin v. Serino et al
as 3:2021cv01690
Plaintiff:
Patrick Gavin, Jr., Michael Kassisky, Tracy Sokoloski and others
Defendant:
Janet M. Serino, Phillip Campenni, Gerald A. Stofko and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv03381
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Miller v. Campana et al
as 4:2021cv00986
Defendant:
Gabriel Campana, Derek Slaughter and City of Williamsport
Plaintiff:
Fred Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01579
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
