Cases 11 - 20 of 22
BANKS v. DUQUESNE LIGHT COMPANY et al
as 2:2013cv01350
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
DUQUESNE LIGHT COMPANY, EQUITABLE GAS COMPANY, EQT PLAZA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BANKS v. STATE FARM et al
as 2:2013cv01152
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
STATE FARM, NIKOLE SULLIVAN, DAVE LNU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BANKS v. STATE FARM et al
as 2:2013cv01151
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
STATE FARM, NIKOLE SULLIVAN, DAN LNU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Banks v. State Farm et al
as 1:2013cv02016
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
State Farm, Nikole Sullivan, Dave LNU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Banks v. Duquesne Light Company et al
as 4:2013cv02017
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Duquesne Light Company, Equitable Gas Company, EQT Plaza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Banks v. State Farm et al
as 1:2013cv01999
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
State Farm, Nikole Sullivan, Dan LNU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BANKS v. SPROAT et al
as 2:2013cv00922
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
JIM SPROAT, CAROL TURLAC, REALTY COUNSELING CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
BANKS v. MACHESKY et al
as 2:2013cv00781
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
MACHESKY, MCHEENEY, ELIZABETH TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Banks v. Conway et al
as 1:2011cv00564
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks
Respondent:
Brendon T. Conway, Paul Hull, Mary Beth Buchanan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Banks v. Equitable Gas Company et al
as 1:2011cv00511
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Equitable Gas Company, John Does, Commissioner of Indian Affairs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
