Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Daniel et al v. Cullman County Court Referral LLC et al
as 5:2015cv00101
Plaintiff:
Creta May Daniel , Jessica B Hooper , Nancy Renee Arnold Holmes and others
Defendant:
Cullman County Court Referral LLC , Cullman County Drug Court, Lisa Sharpton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Elliott v. Madison County Alabama et al
as 5:2014cv01309
Plaintiff:
Robert Elliott
Defendant:
Madison County Alabama , Advanced Correctional Healthcare Inc , Blake Dorning and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Self et al
as 3:2012cv02402
Plaintiff:
Mark D. Davis
Defendant:
Gilbert Porterfield Self , Terry A. Moore , Robert J. Bentley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blanchard v. City of Birmingham et al
as 2:2010cv02250
Plaintiff:
Rodney Blanchard
Defendant:
City of Birmingham and Corey Hooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2010cv02038
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623
Maclin v. Mitchem et al
as 5:2010cv00137
Plaintiff:
T. Mark Maclin, T. Mark Maclin and T. Mark Maclin
Defendant:
Billy Mitchem, William Hobbs, Charles Hooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gulley v. Birmingham, City of et al
as 2:2009cv01709
Plaintiff:
Martez Gulley
Defendant:
Birmingham, City of, A. C. Roper, Corey Hooper and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Montgomery v. Hooper (MAG+)
as 2:2008cv00893
Plaintiff:
James N. Montgomery
Defendant:
Scott J. Hooper
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv00988
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv01648
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
