Cases 11 - 20 of 41
Neway Mengistu v. HACLA
as 16-56591
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NEWAY MENGISTU, an individual
Defendant - Appellee:
HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES, a State of California entity; and others to be joined under Rule 19 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
Neway Mengistu v. HACLA
as 16-56591
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NEWAY MENGISTU, an individual
Defendant / Appellee:
HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES, a State of California entity; and others to be joined under Rule 19 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-56573
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-56573
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Greene v. Housing Auth. of Los Angele
as 16-4148
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CEDRIC GREENE
Defendant - Appellee:
HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES
Greene v. Housing Authority of The City of Los Angeles
as 2:2016cv00806
Plaintiff:
Cedric Greene
Defendant:
Housing Authority of The City of Los Angeles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Greene v. Housing Authority of the City of Los Angeles
as 2:2016cv00490
Plaintiff:
Cedric Greene
Defendant:
Housing Authority of the City of Los Angeles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Larry Jay Hirsch v. Housing Authority of the City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2016cv01239
Defendant:
Andre L Brown, Does, Douglas Guthrie and others
Plaintiff:
Larry Jay Hirsch
Neway Mengistu v. Housing Authority of the City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2015cv05427
Defendant:
Housing Authority of the City of Los Angeles
Plaintiff:
Neway Mengistu
Cedric Tyrone Moore v Housing Authority of the City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2015cv04687
Defendant:
Douglas Guthrie, Douglas Guthrie, Housing Authority of the City of Los Angeles and others
Plaintiff:
Cedric Tyrone Moore
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
