Cases 11 - 20 of 90
Jarrett v. Does 1-25 et al
as 2:2022cv00012
Plaintiff:
Tonee N. Jarrett
Defendant:
Jane Does 1-25, John Does 1-25 and Rodney Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00731
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dillard v. The City of Lynchburg et al
as 6:2022cv00031
Plaintiff:
Devann Dillard
Defendant:
The City of Lynchburg, Jarrod Cox, Elijah Phelps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00369
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
WELLS v. FUENTES et al
as 1:2022cv00140
Plaintiff:
CURTIS LEVAR WELLS, JR
Defendant:
JAVIER FUENTES, SCOTT WANEK, MICHAEL P ARMSTRONG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00074
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Housing Discrimination
Tew v. Hampton Roads Regional Jail Authority et al
as 2:2021cv00641
Plaintiff:
Shane Matthew Tew
Defendant:
Hampton Roads Regional Jail Authority, Wellpath LLC, Correct Care Solutions, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stout et al v. Ofc. Barrow et al
as 3:2021cv00654
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Stout and Marc Stout
Defendant:
Ofc. Barrow, Ofc. Murphy, Ofc. Worley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01092
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
A.J. v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 3:2021cv00533
Plaintiff:
A.J.
Defendant:
The Commonwealth Of Virginia, Superintendent Col. Gary T. Settle, Virginia State Police Trooper Boelt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
