Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01013
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Hatshipsue v. La Salle Bank National Association et al
as 3:2013cv00101
Plaintiff:
Chatura Waheeda Hatshipsue
Defendant:
La Salle Bank National Association, Weissman Nowack, Curry & Wilco, P.C. , U.S. Bank National Association and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Banks v. Memphis City Schools et al
as 2:2012cv02474
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Nicole Banks
Defendant:
Memphis City Schools, Sunya Payne, Tiffany Eason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv02118
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Tester v. Midland Funding, LLC et al
as 2:2011cv00272
Plaintiff:
Joann Golden Tester
Defendant:
Midland Funding, LLC , Midland Credit Management, Inc. , Hosto & Buchan PLLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01107
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2615
Johnson v. Gannon et al
as 3:2009cv00551
Plaintiff:
Joann Johnson
Defendant:
Mike Gannon, Billy Nichols, Charlie Wilder and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv02372
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Hightower et al v. Pinkston et al
as 3:2008cv00355
Plaintiff:
Eva M Hightower and Eva M Hightower
Defendant:
Dorothy Pinkston, Dorothy Pinkston, Dorothy Pinkston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv02507
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
