Cases 11 - 20 of 31
Goodloe v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2012cv03018
Defendant:
Police Officer Frank Chiodi, Detective Cook, Detective Dauge and others
Plaintiff:
Carl Goodloe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wright v. County of Suffolk et al
as 2:2012cv00207
Defendant:
County of Suffolk, Hamlet of Brentwood, John Doe Police Officers 1-5 and others
Plaintiff:
Justin Wright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Alduey v. City of New York et al
as 1:2011cv08162
Plaintiff:
Robert Alduey
Defendant:
City of New York , New York City Police Department, J. Sandobal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ali v. City of New York et al
as 1:2011cv05297
Plaintiff:
Imran Ali
Defendant:
City of New York, Police Officer William Connick, John Doe Police Officers 1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MULDROW v. BRYANT et al
as 2:2011cv05925
Plaintiff:
KEVIN MULDROW
Defendant:
TIMOTHY BRYANT, MILAN MERKE and JOHN DOE POLICE OFFICERS 1-5
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MULDROW v. MERKE et al
as 2:2011cv05898
Plaintiff:
KEVIN MULDROW
Defendant:
MILAN MERKE and JOHN DOE POLICE OFFICERS 1-5
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Collins v. The City of Columbus et al
as 2:2011cv00708
Plaintiff:
George Collins
Defendant:
The City of Columbus, Walter L. Distelzweig, Craig Bowen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PRUITT v. LUTZ et al
as 2:2011cv04821
Plaintiff:
KENYA PRUITT
Defendant:
ROBERT W. LUTZ, MICHAEL WARD, CIRELLIE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2010cv05173
Defendant:
John Doe Police Officers 1-5, The City of New York and William Warren
Plaintiff:
Korey Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2010cv05531
Plaintiff:
Korey Smith
Defendant:
The City of New York, William Warren and John Doe Police Officers 1-5
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
