Cases 11 - 20 of 776
DOE v. MCKERNAN et al
as 1:2024cv00488
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE
Defendant:
JONATHAN MCKERNAN, THE FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION and FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
REEVE v. MONEX INC. et al
as 1:2024cv00408
Plaintiff:
REBECCA REEVE
Defendant:
MONEX INC, JOHN GREEN and GREGORY LYUMKIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
TADESSE v. OREGON STATE CT & COUNTY et al
as 1:2024cv00158
Plaintiff:
YODIT DAGNE TADESSE
Defendant:
OREGON STATE CT & COUNTY, JOHN L. BARLOW, STUBER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FISCHER et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
ALAN E. FISCHER and JOHN DOES 1-10,000
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, US CAPITOL POLICE DEPARTMENT, DC METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
GRIFFIN v. SMITH et al
as 1:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
MARK GRIFFIN
Defendant:
PAMELA SMITH, JOHN DOE and DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03577
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03319
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03253
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
GAMBILL v. JACOBS et al
as 1:2023cv03283
Plaintiff:
BRUCE E. GAMBILL, JR.
Defendant:
ANDREW JACOBS, STATE OF WASHINGTON, PIERCE COUNTY WA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
BUIE v. CROWE et al
as 1:2023cv03178
Plaintiff:
DAYONNA BUIE
Defendant:
TIFFANY CROWE, PAMELA A. SMITH, SHIRLEY KWAN-HUI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
