Cases 11 - 20 of 51
LABONTE v. PORTER et al
as 2:2022cv00937
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM LABONTE
Defendant:
DAVID J. PORTER, KENT A. JORDON and PAUL MATEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
A.A. et al v. CITY OF LANCASTER et al
as 5:2022cv01621
Plaintiff:
A.A. and DANIELLE ROWE
Defendant:
CITY OF LANCASTER, DETECTIVE AUSTIN KRAUSE, EAST HEMPFIELD TOWNSHIP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Schuylkill County Inmates et al v. Commissioners of Centre County et al
as 3:2021cv01342
Plaintiff:
Schuylkill County Inmates, Lycoming County Inmates, Huntingdon County Inmates and others
Defendant:
Commissioners of Centre County, P. J. of Centre County, District Attorney of Centre County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv05983
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
KENT v. PHILA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES
as 2:2019cv02710
Defendant:
PHILA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES
Plaintiff:
MARILYN KENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv04910
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv02267
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Bakhtiari v. Madrigal et al
as 3:2018cv00038
Plaintiff:
Alireza Bakhtiari
Defendant:
Jason Madrigal, Paul Posluzny, Jennifer Ritchey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOWERS v. LANCASTER TOWNSHIP et al
as 2:2017cv01508
Plaintiff:
KENT C. BOWERS
Defendant:
LANCASTER TOWNSHIP and DAVID SITLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Poli v. Pittston Area School District et al
as 3:2017cv00876
Plaintiff:
Camille Poli
Defendant:
Pittston Area School District , John Adonizio , John Donahue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
