Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Radcliff v. State of Alabama et al
as 2:2014cv01868
Plaintiff:
Arthur I. Radcliff
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Birmingham Board of Education, Craig Weatherspoon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watts v. Turnbach et al
as 4:2013cv00175
Plaintiff:
Roger W Watts, Jr
Defendant:
James E Turnbach and Turnbach Warren Roberts & LLoyd PC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Price et al
as 2:2013cv01532
Plaintiff:
Earnest Lee Walker , Sr
Defendant:
Cheryl Price, Kim Thomas, Robert Bentley and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Long v. Sonic Automotive, Inc.(CONSENT)
as 2:2013cv00551
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Long
Defendant:
Sonic Automotive, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv03493
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Bates v. State of Alabama, The et al
as 4:2011cv02183
Plaintiff:
Darren Bates
Defendant:
State of Alabama, The, Marshall County, Alabama, Dekalb County, Alabama and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Butler et al v. Madison County District Attorney and Staff et al
as 5:2011cv01728
Plaintiff:
James L. Butler, Sr. and James L Butler, Jr
Defendant:
Madison County District Attorney and Staff , Alabama Securities Commission, Cristopher Putnam and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv01103
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00511
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00266
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
