Cases 11 - 20 of 138
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04069
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Title IX Educational Amendments 1992 - Sex Discrimination
Whitmore v. Yetman et al
as 4:2023cv00390
Plaintiff:
Zachary Charles Whitmore
Defendant:
Deputy Matthew Yetman, Deputy Eric Erchein, Jailor John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Meier v. Williams et al
as 6:2023cv03085
Plaintiff:
Aaron Edward Meier
Defendant:
Aaron Williams, Matthew Thomas Weatherman and Kim Hathcock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Guenther v. Kimmell et al
as 3:2023cv05009
Plaintiff:
Frederick Joseph Guenther
Defendant:
Stephanie M. Kimmell, Matthew Blaine Baker, State of Missouri Family Support Division and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv06007
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv06007
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Charles v. Real Property Groups
as 2:2022cv04189
Plaintiff:
Matthew C. Charles
Defendant:
Real Property Groups
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American with Disabilities Act
Arnold v. Augustine et al
as 4:2022cv01341
Plaintiff:
Richard T. Arnold
Defendant:
Kenneth P. Augustine, Franklin County Sheriff's Office, Judge Stanley Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv03157
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00620
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
