Cases 11 - 20 of 120
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02843
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00063
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Ledet v. Vandamm Enterprises, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv01186
Plaintiff:
George Ledet
Defendant:
Vandamm Enterprises, LLC, Thomas Chorey, Jr., Daniel White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv05114
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Morris et al v. Walker et al
as 2:2022cv00227
Plaintiff:
Sheyenne Morris, Robert Barnes and Julie Barnes
Defendant:
Joel Walker and Patricia Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Abdur-Rahman v. Arrington, Jr. et al
as 1:2022cv03335
Plaintiff:
Khadijah Abdur-Rahman
Defendant:
Marvin Arrington, Jr., Natalie Hall, Elizabeth Liz Hausman and others
Stepherson v. Blinken et al
as 1:2022cv03547
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Stepherson
Defendant:
Antony Blinken, Debra Anne Haaland, Merrick Garland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Damon v. Simpson et al
as 3:2022cv00127
Plaintiff:
Damon Damon
Defendant:
John T. Simpson, E. Kelley Owens, Donna P. Ivey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dahlquist et al v. Morris et al
as 1:2022cv02162
Defendant:
William Morris, Rocky's Lake Estate, LLC, Cherokee County, Georgia and others
Plaintiff:
Christi Dahlquist and Kirk Dahlquist
SPIVEY v. HANCOCK et al
as 1:2022cv00041
Plaintiff:
MANDRIEZ SPIVEY
Defendant:
SHERIFF BILLY HANCOCK, CPT JOE ARZOLA, SGT JACK MASTERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
