Cases 11 - 20 of 148
South v. Alabama Department of Human Resources et al
as 4:2023cv00675
Plaintiff:
Kayla South
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Human Resources, Kari Pearce, Christopher Pearce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Montgomery v. Looney
as 1:2023cv00131
Plaintiff:
Luther Steven Montgomery
Defendant:
Darlene Looney, Kevin Nelson, Daniel Lawrence and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Collings et al v. Marshall County, Alabama et al
as 4:2023cv00349
Plaintiff:
Eujena R Collings and J Monroe Johnson
Defendant:
Marshall County, Alabama, Samuel Ebeyer, Phil Sims and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gaddis v. Woodruff et al
as 1:2023cv00322
Plaintiff:
Thomas Gaddis
Defendant:
Chad E. Woodruff, Steven Marshall, Todd Barksdale and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gaddis et al v. Hamm et al
as 1:2023cv00078
Plaintiff:
Thomas Gaddis
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, John Q. Hamm, Steve Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Peden et al v. Gwathney et al
as 2:2023cv00050
Plaintiff:
Terry Henderson Peden and The Law Group of THP, PLLC.
Defendant:
Leigh Gwathney, Dwayne Spurlock, Kay Ivey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Robert v. Jackson et al
as 5:2022cv01594
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Isaiah Robert
Defendant:
Krystina T Jackson, Assistant District Attorney and Steve Marshall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01503
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01474
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Mitchum v. Blankenship et al (MAG+)
as 2:2022cv00615
Plaintiff:
William Lee Mitchum
Defendant:
Christopher M. Blankenship and Steve Marshall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
