Cases 11 - 20 of 45
Marshall II v. Hall et al
as 1:2019cv02044
Defendant:
Michael S. Vaughn and Joshua M. Hall
Plaintiff:
Bryon Marshall II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01630
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00074
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv02779
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Weeden v. Prince George's County et al
as 8:2017cv02013
Plaintiff:
Levon Derrell Weeden
Defendant:
Prince George's County, City of New Carrollton, Maryland , City of New Carrollton, Maryland Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jackson v Harris et al
as 1:2017cv00373
Plaintiff:
Billy Ray Jackson
Defendant:
L Harris, Hendersen-Webb, Inc., Jeff Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv02338
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12111 Americans with Disabilities Act - Employment
J.G. v. Prince George's County Board of Education et al
as 8:2016cv01008
Plaintiff:
J.G.
Defendant:
Prince George's County Board of Education and Jacqueline Marshall-Hall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Howell et al v. Teamsters Local No. 639 et al
as 1:2016cv00344
Plaintiff:
James H. Howell, Robert S. Marshall, Glenroy Schissler and others
Defendant:
Teamsters Local No. 639, Teamsters 639 Employers Pension Trust Fund, Administrators and Officers of Teamsters 639 Employers Pension Trust Fund and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2015cv03488
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
