Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv03362
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
REED MATTILA v. LOWER MAKEFIELD TWP PA. POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 3:2020cv14699
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER TREVOR REED MATILLA and CHRISTOPHER TREVOR REED MATTILA
Defendant:
NORRISTOWN STATE HOSPITAL, MHM SERVICES, ALL DEFENDANT UNKNOWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv06159
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 200
BAILEY et al v. THE US GOV'T et al
as 2:2013cv03990
Plaintiff:
SHAROL ANTHONY BAILEY, CHRISTINE CAROLINE BEYNON and ANDREW SHAROL BEYNON-BAILEY
Defendant:
THE US GOV'T, THE STRATIGIC DEFENCE INITIATIVE, THE PENTAGON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TILLIO v. NELL et al
as 2:2012cv02420
Plaintiff:
PATRICK DANIEL TILLIO, SR.
Defendant:
ROCIO NELL, NORRISTOWN STATE HOSPITAL, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WELFARE OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TILLIO v. KENT et al
as 2:2012cv01436
Plaintiff:
PATRICK TILLIO, JR.
Defendant:
GERRY KENT, ROCIA NELL, NORRISTOWN STATE HOSPITAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROBERTS v. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WELFARE et al
as 2:2011cv06241
Plaintiff:
GREGORY STANLEY ROBERTS
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WELFARE, NORRISTOWN STATE HOSPITAL and RICHARD SZCYWROWSKI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
WELLS v. NORRISTOWN STATE HOSPITAL PA DEPT OF PUBLIC WELFARE
as 2:2008cv05870
Plaintiff:
EUGENE WELLS
Defendant:
NORRISTOWN STATE HOSPITAL PA DEPT OF PUBLIC WELFARE
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv00869
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
