Cases 11 - 20 of 186
Chapman v. Karp et al
as 3:2023cv00424
Plaintiff:
Pamela Chapman
Defendant:
Jonathon Karp, Nancy Graham, Hope van Beuren and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Judith Williams v. Nancy Pelosi
as 23-10510
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JUDITH MARCIA WILLIAMS
Defendant / Appellee:
NANCY PELOSI
CHUKWU v. PELOSI
as 3:2023cv00960
Plaintiff:
OBIOMA CHUKWU
Defendant:
NANCY PELOSI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv20485
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv20494
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
WILLIAMS v. PELOSI
as 4:2022cv00453
Plaintiff:
JUDITH MARCIA WILLIAMS
Defendant:
NANCY PELOSI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Magistrelli v. Former US Attorney et al
as 2:2022cv00250
Defendant:
Former US Attorney, Former United States of America President, Illinois Circuit Court Judge and others
Plaintiff:
Karol Dawn Magistrelli
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dmt MacTruong, et al v. Mike DeWine, et al
as 22-3939
Plaintiff:
VICE PRESIDENT KAMALA HARRIS, FIRST LADY JILL BIDEN, SPEAKER NANCY PELOSI and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DMT MACTRUONG
Defendant / Appellee:
GOVERNOR MIKE DEWINE, ATTORNEY GENERAL DAVE YOST, SENATOR ROB MCCOLLEY and others
DURBIN v. PELOSI et al
as 1:2022cv03222
Plaintiff:
JOHN PAUL DURBIN
Defendant:
NANCY PATRICIA PELOSI, CHARLES ELLIS SCHUMER, ADDISON MITCHELL MCCONNELL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
BARRETT v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2022cv02823
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY P. BARRETT
Defendant:
JOSEPH BIDEN, KAMALA HARRIS, BARACK OBAMA and others
Claimant:
NANCY PELOSI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
