Cases 11 - 20 of 131
Phillips v. Public Safety et al
as 4:2023cv00824
Plaintiff:
Clint Phillips, III
Defendant:
Public Safety, Metro Transit Agency and Sam Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Phillips v. University of Missouri
as 2:2023cv00365
Plaintiff:
Terrence Phillips
Defendant:
University of Missouri
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Title IX Educational Amendments 1992 - Sex Discrimination
Phillips v. University of Missouri
as 4:2023cv00365
Plaintiff:
Terrence Phillips
Defendant:
University of Missouri
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Title IX Educational Amendments 1992 - Sex Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00415
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Phillips v. Cirkle K Gas Station
as 4:2022cv01090
Plaintiff:
Clint Phillips, III
Defendant:
Cirkle K Gas Station
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Phillips et al v. St. Louis County
as 4:2022cv00759
Plaintiff:
Clint Phillips, III and D.A.P.
Defendant:
St. Louis County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00596
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Phillips v. St. Louis County
as 4:2022cv00091
Plaintiff:
Clint Phillips, III
Defendant:
St. Louis County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Phillips v. Two unknown police officer of City of St. Louis et al
as 4:2022cv00093
Plaintiff:
Clint Phillips, III
Defendant:
Two unknown police officer of City of St. Louis, City of St. Louis, Dr. Pimiente Christancho and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Phillips v. Akbar et al
as 4:2021cv00909
Plaintiff:
Clint Phillips, III
Defendant:
Keyjab Akbar and United Mart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
